Obama/Bush Junta News and Commentary for the Reality Based Community

News and Commentary    Satire    Pictures    Esoteric Media  Stray Thoughts

more Stray Thoughts
from Don Alejandro:

Don't forget to carry a butterfly net when you protest the war

Why make the stupid choice?

CNN's Dan Rivers inadvertently voices a taboo truth

Has anyone wondered why Albanians were allowed to "mob" Bush?

Proposed gas price gouging law tilts heavily in favor of corporations

Monica "didn't mean to" repeatedly break the law

God answers Falwell's prayer with a resounding "No"

Why bears are Colbert's number one threat to America

Fabricating War With Iran - False Flag Operations on the Cheap

Did CNN air a fake video?

An Ugly Truth Behind a Botched Joke

Bush (Pot) calls Ahmadinejad (Kettle) Evil (Black)

"Incorrect facts" is an oxymoron

AP misses another golden opportunity

Pentagon Video Images Show Object that Looks Suspiciously Like a Missile

So what's the difference whether Saddam had real weapons of mass destruction or only daydreams of  restarting his weapons of mass destruction related program activities?

Colbert just another intelligence failure for Bush crew

It's the Cheap Labor, Stupid!

No Wonder Democrats Can't Muster Opposition to Orwellian Tyranny of BushCo

Is Bush a Terrorist Appeaser

Libby Takes a Fall

Judge Answers Question about Whether Commanders Knew of Abuse at Abu Ghraib

True Facts

A Plague of Rovents

October 5, 2006

Could Rove be ABC's Foley Informant?

No, not personally, but through one of his rovents.  Think about it before you dismiss the idea as crazy.  It's just twisted enough to appeal to Rove, especially since no one would ever imagine he was behind the timing of the Foley scandal (for which the right wing is already pointing the finger at democrats).

Predictably, the ensuing scandal has all bit eliminated discourse about the recent repeal of the constitution, Iraq's continuing descent into hell, or the revelations in Woodward's new book.  Coverage of the child king's incompetence and malfeasance has been replaced by sound bytes of Bush's righteous outrage at Foley.

But would Rove really risk so much potential collateral damage to Republicans in congress just to deflect attention from his liege?   Considering the skill with which the Republican machine has been able to suppress and alter the vote in recent elections it's conceivable that Rove simply isn't worried about too many Democrats winning - he knows the fix is in.

Another plus for Rove is that Foley is gay, so the Republican base can get itself worked up into a frothy gay liberal value bashing lather between now and November 7.  Fox and AP have already been caught labeling Foley as a democrat.  Even if Hastert succumbs to the scandal, and Boehner fails to recover from the whiplash of his changing stories, Roy Blunt is standing in line to service Rove's needs.

And if anyone questions the statistically impossible results that will soon spew from electronic voting machines, or wonders about widespread systematic suppression of primarily democratic voters, well they had better not appear to be hostile about it.

Stray Thoughts from Don Alejandro
who wonders if Hastert ever went out for ice cream with a congressman...