Bush Junta News and Commentary for the Reality Based Community

News and Commentary    Satire    Pictures    Esoteric Media  Stray Thoughts

more Stray Thoughts
from Don Alejandro:

Don't forget to carry a butterfly net when you protest the war

Why make the stupid choice?

CNN's Dan Rivers inadvertently voices a taboo truth

Has anyone wondered why Albanians were allowed to "mob" Bush?

Proposed gas price gouging law tilts heavily in favor of corporations

Monica "didn't mean to" repeatedly break the law

God answers Falwell's prayer with a resounding "No"

Why bears are Colbert's number one threat to America

Fabricating War With Iran - False Flag Operations on the Cheap

Did CNN air a fake video?

An Ugly Truth Behind a Botched Joke

Bush (Pot) calls Ahmadinejad (Kettle) Evil (Black)

"Incorrect facts" is an oxymoron

AP misses another golden opportunity

Pentagon Video Images Show Object that Looks Suspiciously Like a Missile

So what's the difference whether Saddam had real weapons of mass destruction or only daydreams of  restarting his weapons of mass destruction related program activities?

Colbert just another intelligence failure for Bush crew

It's the Cheap Labor, Stupid!

No Wonder Democrats Can't Muster Opposition to Orwellian Tyranny of BushCo

Is Bush a Terrorist Appeaser

Libby Takes a Fall

Judge Answers Question about Whether Commanders Knew of Abuse at Abu Ghraib

True Facts

A Plague of Rovents

 

October 28, 2005
 

Libby broke his leg recently in "some sort of accident," according to CNN's Wolf Blitzer.  Coincidence, or just Rove's humorous way of letting LIbby know he's the fall guy?

   

Libby Takes a Fall

It's already become apparent that the right wing echo chamber will reverberate with the message that Libby was not charged with the "underlying crime" of outing a covert agent, as if that somehow proves Libby was innocent of the crime that launched the investigation. 

Fitzgerald addressed this briefly in his press conference when he explained that in order to charge someone with a crime based on nuances (such as whether Libby knew Plame was a covert agent) he needs to know the "truth" surrounding the incident.   

Since Libby lied, Fitzgerald doesn't know for sure whether the original crime was committed knowingly or just out of stupidity, so he can't indict Libby for outing Plame even though Libby may well have knowingly committed the crime.  So Fitzgerald did the next best thing, which is to charge Libby with a crime he can prove (like taking Al Capone down for tax evasion).

The fact that Libby has not yet been (or may never be) charged with outing Plame in no way exonerates him or others in the Bush administration of the underlying crime. 

Stray Thoughts from Don Alejandro
Who wonders just exactly how Libby's leg was broken...