George W. Bush was a supporter of the war in Vietnam. For a
while.
As he explained in his autobiography, "A Charge to
Keep: My Journey to the White House":
"My inclination was to support the government and
the war until proven wrong, and that only came later, as I
realized we could not explain the mission, had no exit
strategy, and did not seem to be fighting to win."
How is it that he ultimately came to see the fiasco in
Vietnam so clearly but remains so blind to the frighteningly
similar realities of his own war in Iraq? Mr. Bush cannot
explain our mission in Iraq and has nothing resembling an
exit strategy, and his troops - hobbled by shortages of
personnel and by potentially fatal American and Iraqi
political considerations - are certainly not fighting to
win.
As the situation in Iraq moves from bad to worse, the
president, based on his public comments, seems to be edging
further and further from reality. This is disturbing, to say
the least. The news from Iraq is filled with reports of
kidnappings and beheadings, of people pleading desperately
for their lives, of American soldiers being ambushed and
killed, of clusters of Iraqis being blown to pieces by
suicide bombers, and of the prospects for a credible
election in January tumbling toward nil.
The war effort has deteriorated so drastically that the
administration is planning to take more than $3 billion
earmarked for crucial reconstruction projects and shift them
to security programs designed to ward off the increasingly
deadly insurgency. A classified National Intelligence
Estimate prepared for the president contained no really good
prospects for Iraq. The best-case scenario was a country
with only tenuous stability. The worst potential outcome was
civil war.
The intelligence estimate was prepared in July, and the
situation has only worsened since then.
Even Republicans are starting to voice their concerns
about the unfolding disaster. When asked on CBS's "Face
the Nation" whether the U.S. was winning the war in
Iraq, Senator Chuck Hagel, a Nebraska Republican, said,
"No, I don't think we're winning." He said the
U.S. was "in deep trouble in Iraq" and that some
"recalibration of policy" would be necessary to
turn things around.
Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican, said on
"Fox News Sunday": "The situation has
obviously been somewhat deteriorating, to say the
least." He said "serious mistakes" have been
made and that most of them "can be traced back to not
having sufficient numbers of troops there."
These are not doves talking. These are supporters of
President Bush who support the war in Iraq and believe it
can be won. But they're also in touch with reality.
President Bush does not share their sense of alarm. He
acknowledged that "horrible scenes" are being
shown on television and the Internet, but he was unmoved by
the gloomy intelligence estimates. According to Mr. Bush:
"The C.I.A. laid out several scenarios. It said that
life could be lousy, life could be O.K., life could be
better."
Que sera, sera.
The president said he is personally optimistic and he
delivered an upbeat assessment of conditions in Iraq to the
U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday. Iraq, he said, is well on
its way to being "secure, democratic, federal and
free."
If you spend more than a little time immersed in the
world according to Karl Rove, you'll find that words lose
even the remotest connection to reality. They become nothing
more than tools designed to achieve political ends. So it's
not easy to decipher what the president believes about Iraq.
This is scary. With Americans, Iraqis and others dying
horribly in the long dark night of this American-led war,
the world needs more from the president of the United States
than the fool's gold of his empty utterances.
Perhaps someone can dislodge the president from Karl's
clutches, shake him and tell him that his war is a
tremendous tragedy with implications far beyond the election
in November.
At the moment there is no evidence the president
understands anything about the war. He led the nation into
it with false pretenses. He never mobilized sufficient
numbers of troops. He seemed to believe the war was over in
May 2003. And he seems not to know how to proceed now.
The tragic lesson of Vietnam is staring the president in
the face. But he'll have to become better acquainted with
the real world before he can even begin to learn from it.