This article originally provided by
Common Dreams
December 7, 2004
Hyping Terror For Fun, Profit - And Power
by Thom Hartmann
What if there really was no need for much - or even most -
of the Cold War? What if, in fact, the Cold War had been
kept alive for two decades based on phony WMD threats?
What if, similarly, the War On Terror was largely a scam,
and the administration was hyping it to seem
larger-than-life? What if our "enemy" represented a real but
relatively small threat posed by rogue and criminal groups
well outside the mainstream of Islam? What if that hype was
done largely to enhance the power, electability, and stature
of George W. Bush and Tony Blair?
And what if the world was to discover the most shocking
dimensions of these twin deceits - that the same men
promulgated them in the 1970s and today?
It happened.
The myth-shattering event took place in England the first
three weeks of October, when the BBC aired a three-hour
documentary written and produced by Adam Curtis, titled "The
Power of Nightmares." If the emails and phone calls many
of us in the US received from friends in the UK - and debate
in the pages of publications like
The Guardian are any indicator, this was a seismic
event, one that may have even provoked a hasty meeting
between Blair and Bush a few weeks later.
According to this carefully researched and well-vetted
BBC documentary, Richard Nixon, following in the steps of
his mentor and former boss Dwight D. Eisenhower, believed it
was possible to end the Cold War and eliminate fear from the
national psyche. The nation need no longer be afraid of
communism or the Soviet Union. Nixon worked out a truce with
the Soviets, meeting their demands for safety as well as the
US needs for security, and then announced to Americans that
they need no longer be afraid.
In 1972, President Richard Nixon returned from the Soviet
Union with a treaty worked out by Secretary of State Henry
Kissinger, the beginning of a process Kissinger called
"détente." On June 1, 1972, Nixon gave a speech in which he
said, "Last Friday, in Moscow, we witnessed the
beginning of the end of that era which began in 1945. With
this step, we have enhanced the security of both nations. We
have begun to reduce the level of fear, by reducing the
causes of fear—for our two peoples, and for all peoples in
the world."
But Nixon left amid scandal and Ford came in, and Ford's
Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld) and Chief of Staff
(Dick Cheney) believed it was intolerable that Americans
might no longer be bound by fear. Without fear, how could
Americans be manipulated?
Rumsfeld and Cheney began a concerted effort - first
secretly and then openly - to undermine Nixon's treaty for
peace and to rebuild the state of fear and, thus, reinstate
the Cold War.
And these two men - 1974 Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld and Ford Chief of Staff Dick Cheney - did this by
claiming that the Soviets had secret weapons of mass
destruction that the president didn't know about, that the
CIA didn't know about, that nobody but them knew about. And,
they said, because of those weapons, the US must redirect
billions of dollars away from domestic programs and instead
give the money to defense contractors for whom these two men
would one day work.
"The Soviet Union has been busy," Defense
Secretary Rumsfeld explained to America in 1976.
"They’ve been busy in terms of their level of effort;
they’ve been busy in terms of the actual weapons they ’ve
been producing; they’ve been busy in terms of expanding
production rates; they’ve been busy in terms of expanding
their institutional capability to produce additional weapons
at additional rates; they’ve been busy in terms of expanding
their capability to increasingly improve the sophistication
of those weapons. Year after year after year, they’ve been
demonstrating that they have steadiness of purpose. They’re
purposeful about what they’re doing."
The CIA strongly disagreed, calling Rumsfeld's position a
"complete fiction" and pointing out that the Soviet Union
was disintegrating from within, could barely afford to feed
their own people, and would collapse within a decade or two
if simply left alone.
But Rumsfeld and Cheney wanted Americans to believe there
was something nefarious going on, something we should be
very afraid of. To this end, they convinced President Ford
to appoint a commission including their old friend Paul
Wolfowitz to prove that the Soviets were up to no good.
According to Curtis' BBC documentary, Wolfowitz's group,
known as "Team B," came to the conclusion that the Soviets
had developed several terrifying new weapons of mass
destruction, featuring a nuclear-armed submarine fleet that
used a sonar system that didn't depend on sound and was,
thus, undetectable with our current technology.
The BBC's documentarians asked Dr. Anne Cahn of the U.S.
Arms Control and Disarmament Agency during that time, her
thoughts on Rumsfeld's, Cheney's, and Wolfowitz's 1976 story
of the secret Soviet WMDs. Here's a clip from a transcript
of that BBC documentary:
" Dr ANNE CAHN, Arms Control and Disarmament
Agency, 1977-80: They couldn't say that the Soviets had
acoustic means of picking up American submarines,
because they couldn't find it. So they said, well maybe
they have a non-acoustic means of making our submarine
fleet vulnerable. But there was no evidence that they
had a non-acoustic system. They’re saying, 'we can’t
find evidence that they’re doing it the way that
everyone thinks they’re doing it, so they must be doing
it a different way. We don’t know what that different
way is, but they must be doing it.'
"INTERVIEWER (off-camera): Even though there was
no evidence.
"CAHN: Even though there was no evidence.
"INTERVIEWER: So they’re saying there, that the
fact that the weapon doesn’t exist…
"CAHN: Doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist. It
just means that we haven’t found it."
The moderator of the BBC documentary then notes:
" What Team B accused the CIA of missing was a
hidden and sinister reality in the Soviet Union. Not
only were there many secret weapons the CIA hadn’t
found, but they were wrong about many of those they
could observe, such as the Soviet air defenses. The CIA
were convinced that these were in a state of collapse,
reflecting the growing economic chaos in the Soviet
Union. Team B said that this was actually a cunning
deception by the Soviet régime. The air-defense system
worked perfectly. But the only evidence they produced to
prove this was the official Soviet training manual,
which proudly asserted that their air-defense system was
fully integrated and functioned flawlessly. The CIA
accused Team B of moving into a fantasy world."
Nonetheless, as Melvin Goodman, head of the CIA's Office
of Soviet Affairs, 1976-87, noted in the BBC documentary,
" Rumsfeld won that very intense, intense political
battle that was waged in Washington in 1975 and 1976.
Now, as part of that battle, Rumsfeld and others, people
such as Paul Wolfowitz, wanted to get into the CIA. And
their mission was to create a much more severe view of
the Soviet Union, Soviet intentions, Soviet views about
fighting and winning a nuclear war."
Although Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld's assertions of powerful
new Soviet WMDs were unproven - they said the lack of proof
proved that undetectable weapons existed - they nonetheless
used their charges to push for dramatic escalations in
military spending to selected defense contractors, a process
that continued through the Reagan administration.
But, trillions of dollars and years later, it was proven
that they had been wrong all along, and the CIA had been
right. Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Wolfowitz lied to America in
the 1970s about Soviet WMDs.
Not only do we now know that the Soviets didn't have any
new and impressive WMDs, but we also now know that they
were, in fact, decaying from within, ripe for collapse any
time, regardless of what the US did - just as the CIA (and
anybody who visited Soviet states - as I had - during that
time could easily predict). The Soviet economic and
political system wasn't working, and their military was
disintegrating.
As arms-control expert Cahn noted in the documentary of
those 1970s claims by Wolfowitz, Cheney, and Rumsfeld:
"I would say that all of it was fantasy. I mean,
they looked at radars out in Krasnoyarsk and said, 'This
is a laser beam weapon,' when in fact it was nothing of
the sort. ... And if you go through most of Team B’s
specific allegations about weapons systems, and you just
examine them one by one, they were all wrong."
"INTERVIEWER: All of them?
"CAHN: All of them.
"INTERVIEWER: Nothing true?
"CAHN: I don’t believe anything in [Wolfowitz's
1977] Team B was really true."
But the neocons said it was true, and organized a group -
The
Committee on the Present Danger - to promote their
worldview. The Committee produced documentaries,
publications, and provided guests for national talk shows
and news reports. They worked hard to whip up fear and
encourage increases in defense spending, particularly for
sophisticated weapons systems offered by the defense
contractors for whom neocons would later become lobbyists.
And they succeeded in recreating an atmosphere of fear in
the United States, and making themselves and their defense
contractor friends richer than most of the kingdoms of the
world.
The Cold War was good for business, and good for the
political power of its advocates, from Rumsfeld to Reagan.
Similarly, according to this documentary, the War On
Terror is the same sort of scam, run for many of the same
reasons, by the same people. And by hyping it - and then
invading Iraq - we may well be bringing into reality terrors
and forces that previously existed only on the margins and
with very little power to harm us.
Curtis' documentary suggests that the War On Terror is
just as much a fiction as were the super-WMDs this same
group of neocons said the Soviets had in the 70s. He
suggests we've done more to create terror than to fight it.
That the risk was really quite minimal (at least until we
invaded Iraq), and the terrorists are - like most terrorist
groups - simply people on the fringes, rather easily
dispatched by their own people. He even points out that Al
Qaeda itself was a brand we invented, later adopted by bin
Laden because we'd put so many millions into creating
worldwide name recognition for it.
Watching "The Terror of Nightmares" is like taking the
Red Pill in the movie The Matrix.
It's the story of idealism gone wrong, of ideologies
promoted in the US by Leo Strauss and his followers
(principally Wolfowitz, Feith, and Pearle), and in the
Muslim world by bin Laden's mentor, Ayman Zawahiri. Both
sought to create a utopian world through world domination;
both believe that the ends justify the means; both are
convinced that "the people" must be frightened into
embracing religion and nationalism for the greater good of
morality and a stable state. Each needs the other in order
to hold power.
Whatever your plans are for tonight or tomorrow, clip
three hours out of them and take the Red Pill. Get a pair of
headphones (the audio is faint), plug them into your
computer, and visit an unofficial archive of the Curtis' BBC
documentary at the Information Clearing House
website. (The third hour of the program, in a more
viewable format, is also available
here.)
For those who prefer to read things online, an unofficial
but complete transcript is on this Belgian
site.
But be forewarned: You'll never see political reality -
and certainly never hear the words of the Bush or Blair
administrations - the same again.
Thom Hartmann (thom at thomhartmann.com) is a Project
Censored Award-winning best-selling author and host of a
nationally syndicated daily progressive talk show.
www.thomhartmann.com His most recent books are "The
Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight," "Unequal
Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of
Human Rights," "We
The People: A Call To Take Back America,"
The Edison Gene, and "What
Would Jefferson Do?: A Return To Democracy." |