|
This article originally provided by
Yahoo
July 7, 2007
Fred Thompson aided Nixon on Watergate
By JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer
Fred Thompson gained an image as a tough-minded
investigative counsel for the Senate Watergate committee.
Yet President Nixon and his top aides viewed the fellow
Republican as a willing, if not too bright, ally, according
to White House tapes.
Thompson, now preparing a bid for the 2008 GOP
presidential nomination, won fame in 1973 for asking a
committee witness the bombshell question that revealed Nixon
had installed hidden listening devices and taping equipment
in the Oval Office.
Those tapes show Thompson played a behind-the-scenes role
that was very different from his public image three decades
ago. He comes across as a partisan willing to cooperate with
the Nixon White House's effort to discredit the committee's
star witness.
It was Thompson who tipped off the White House that the
Senate committee knew about the tapes. They eventually
cinched Nixon's downfall in the scandal resulting from the
break-in at Democratic headquarters in the Watergate complex
in Washington and the subsequent White House cover-up.
Thompson, then 30, was appointed counsel by his political
mentor, Tennessee Sen. Howard Baker, the top Republican on
the Senate investigative committee. Thompson had been an
assistant U.S. attorney in Nashville, Tenn., and had managed
Baker's re-election campaign. Thompson later was a senator
himself.
Nixon was disappointed with the selection of Thompson,
whom he called "dumb as hell." The president did not think
Thompson was skilled enough to interrogate unfriendly
witnesses and would be outsmarted by the committee's
Democratic counsel.
This assessment comes from audio tapes of White House
conversations recently reviewed by The Associated Press at
the National Archives in College Park, Md., and transcripts
of those discussions that are published in "Abuse of Power:
The New Watergate Tapes," by historian Stanley Kutler.
"Oh s---, that kid," Nixon said when told by his chief of
staff, H.R. Haldeman, of Thompson's appointment on Feb. 22,
1973.
"Well, we're stuck with him," Haldeman said.
In a meeting later that day in the Old Executive Office
Building, Baker assured Nixon that Thompson was up to the
task. "He's tough. He's six feet five inches, a big mean
fella," the senator told Nixon.
Publicly, Baker and Thompson presented themselves as
dedicated to uncovering the truth. But Baker had secret
meetings and conversations with Nixon and his top aides,
while Thompson worked cooperatively with the White House and
accepted coaching from Nixon's lawyer, J. Fred Buzhardt, the
tapes and transcripts show.
"We've got a pretty good rapport with Fred Thompson,"
Buzhardt told Nixon in an Oval Office meeting on June 6,
1973. The meeting included a discussion of former White
House counsel John Dean's upcoming testimony before the
committee.
Dean, the committee's star witness, had agreed to tell
what he knew about the break-in and cover-up if he was
granted immunity against anything incriminating he might
say.
Nixon expressed concern that Thompson was not "very
smart."
"Not extremely so," Buzhardt agreed.
"But he's friendly," Nixon said.
"But he's friendly," Buzhardt agreed. "We are hoping,
though, to work with Thompson and prepare him, if Dean does
appear next week, to do a very thorough cross-examination."
Five days later, Buzhardt reported to Nixon that he had
primed Thompson for the Dean cross-examination.
"I found Thompson most cooperative, feeling more
Republican every day," Buzhardt said. "Uh, perfectly
prepared to assist in really doing a cross-examination."
Later in the same conversation, Buzhardt said Thompson
was "willing to go, you know, pretty much the distance now.
And he said he realized his responsibility was going to have
be as a Republican increasingly."
Thompson, who declined comment for this story, described
himself in his book, "At That Point in Time," published in
1975, as a Nixon administration "loyalist" who struggled
with his role as minority counsel. "I would try to walk a
fine line between a good-faith pursuit of the investigation
and a good-faith attempt to insure balance and fairness,"
Thompson wrote.
When Dean began testifying on June 25, he implicated
Nixon in the break-in and cover-up. But his testimony had
little legal impact because it was his word against the
president's.
During Dean's testimony, Baker asked the question that
became the embodiment of the Watergate scandal: "What did
the president know and when did he know it?" Thompson is
sometimes credited with supplying the question to Baker.
The question was widely perceived at the time as an
example of Baker's willingness to press for truth at the
expense of his party's leader. Historian Kutler, however,
said he believes that in the context of Dean's testimony,
the question was Baker's attempt to point out that the
evidence hinged on one witness's word.
It was not until three weeks later — after the disclosure
of the existence of tape recordings that might either
corroborate or disprove Dean's testimony — that Baker's
question took on new meaning, Kutler said.
At a hearing on July 16, Thompson asked former White
House aide Alexander Butterfield: "Mr. Butterfield, are you
aware of the installation of any listening devices in the
Oval Office of the president?"
Butterfield's confirmation of the recordings set off a
cascade of events that led to Nixon's resignation 13 months
later.
The question made Thompson instantly famous. His
political Web site — http://www.imwithfred.com — prominently
notes: "Friends in Tennessee still recall seeing the boy
they'd grown up with on TV, sitting at the Senate
hearing-room dais. He gained national attention for leading
the line of inquiry that revealed the audio-taping system in
the White House Oval Office."
What rarely is mentioned is that Thompson knew the answer
to the question before he asked it. Investigators for the
committee had gotten the information out of Butterfield
during hours of behind-the-scenes questioning three days
earlier, on July 13.
Thompson was not present, but a Republican investigator
immediately tracked him down at the Carroll Arms Hotel bar
where he was meeting with a reporter. Thompson called
Buzhardt over the weekend to tip off the White House that
the committee knew about the tapes.
"Legalisms aside, it was inconceivable to me that the
White House could withhold the tapes once their existence
was made known. I believed it would be in everyone's
interest if the White House realized, before making any
public statements, the probable position of both the
majority and the minority of the Watergate committee,"
Thompson wrote in his book.
Scott Armstrong, a Democratic investigator for the
committee who was part of the Butterfield questioning, said
he was outraged by Thompson's tip-off.
"When the prosecutor discovers the smoking the gun, he's
going to be shocked to find that the deputy prosecutor
called the defendant and said, 'You'd better get rid of that
gun,'" Armstrong said in an interview.
The committee chairman, Sen. Sam Ervin, D-N.C., had
agreed to allow Thompson to question Butterfield first at
the July 16 hearing as a show of bipartisanship because a
GOP investigator had elicited the initial information from
Butterfield.
"Fred (Thompson) and Baker carried water for the White
House, but I have to give them credit — they were watching
out for their interests, too," Kutler said. "They weren't
going to mindlessly go down the tubes for this guy."
___
On the Net:
Nixon presidential materials: http://tinyurl.com/2bqg9a
|