so-called “roundtable interview” (i.e.,
propaganda-op) on Monday, Bush continued not
commenting on Karl Rove (except for declaring his
complete confidence in Rove) by offering the
following gem, "Why don't you wait and see what the
true facts are?"
facts? Is it just me or does that seem redundantly
repetitive? Isn’t a “fact” true by definition?
Of course, in the Orwellian world of Bush Ad-speak, “true
facts” sounds more like a double plus oxymoron than
a reference to exceptionally true information, at
least to anyone not lobotomized by Faux News
and the rest of the mainstream media.
Sure enough, Robert Novak and other
Rovents appear to be
busy fabricating “true facts” to
protect Bush’s Brain (aka Turdblossom). You
see, in BushWorld “true facts” are created by
repeating lies through compliant media megaphones,
as during the run-up to war.